Poklonskaya not to seek the leadership of the Duma not to show “Matilda” in the lower house

MOSCOW, September 13. /TASS/. The Deputy of the state Duma Natalia Poklonskaya will not seek the leadership of the lower house of Parliament with a request not to show on October 26 in the Duma cinema club film by Alexei Uchitel “Matilda”.

See also

Restless “Matilda”: what is known about the situation of the film by Alexei Uchitel

Earlier, the Chairman of the Duma Committee on culture, film Director Stanislav Govorukhin, has confirmed that the show “Matilda” will take place on 26 October in the state Duma simultaneously with the release of the movie was released.

“I ask [not to show the film in the state Duma] did not intend. Accept the decision of the head of the state Duma and the Committee [of the chamber of culture]. I was there [in the Duma cinema club] do not go and not going. I’m going to carry out their work in accordance with the law”, – told TASS on Wednesday Poklonskaya.

She said that overall her attitude is neutral . “[The film in the Duma cinema club] are generally in any way. With a capital letter in any way”, – added the MP.

“I am your emotions are trying by force to restrain. Therefore, offensively-inoffensive – that’s the second question, but whether the ethical standards of the fact that, contrary to the opinion of the public and the requirements of the law are issued a rental license for one evening, in spite of everything, is a matter for the relevant authorities”, – said the politician. According to her, “rental license was issued in violation of the law.”

“The position description, the opinion of the Public Council under the Ministry of culture no one even asked. The opinion of the Public Council strongly negative, as already expressed [head of Council] Pavel Pozhigailo, who says that the Public Council, this film is not presented as it provide certain procedural rules when issuing the distribution certificate,” – said the Deputy.


Alexey Uchitel: the failure of two cinema chains roll “Matilda” is a knife in the back
Go to Interview

Taylor believes that “the current situation around this movie says one thing: that the film as written in the conclusions of examinations, incite hatred, provokes the Commission of the offenses to the manifestation of extremism and radicalism.” “I’m sure that law enforcement and regulatory authorities will pay attention to it,” she said.

While Poklonskaya finds that among the opponents of “Matilda” can be both real and not. “There are different enemies: there are radical activists – it can be both opponents and aprotinine, and maybe it’s the actors some. Who knows who it is. Must be installed by the investigator who it is,” she explained.

The MP drew attention that about response opposed to “Matilda” activists “they say only two people – the Director, Teacher and advocate [Director] Dobrynin”. “That “look, tomorrow will be worse”. More such threats from no one heard. That’s just from the mouth of the Director and his lawyer,” said the Deputy.

Poklonski also once again drew attention to the financing of the film. “The budget money that had been allocated (280 million rubles of state budget funds) was allocated under a different scenario. To draw attention to the need for the expenditure of the budget: the budget money allocated under the other scenario – the film about the dancer, not the Emperor, who in the film plays a porn star” – she concluded.

Leave a comment

Confirm that you are not a bot - select a man with raised hand: